Rahul


 * Round 1**
 * Judge:** Rinda
 * Speaker Position:** 2A
 * Comments:**

__Speaking__
 * -** Good clarity

__2AC__ - I think your time allocation was good in terms of distribution on each flow. But you should read more offense and add-ons in order to put the negative block on the defensive.
 * -** Embedded clash on case - don't do "they say, we say." Just make your response, using your opponent's wording and/or numbering to let the judge know which argument you are referencing.

__2AR__ - Good 2AR - you definitely made the right decision to weigh your case against the kritik. - You have to respond to the root cause argument - point out how your case solves these particular instances, and how it doesn't matter if long-term replication happens if you're dead, which is why your short-term impacts come first. - Good job extending the Hans evidence about how your epistemology is correct - but the warrants were not extended at all throughout the 2AC and the 1AR. You definitely should have emphasized them more, and they also magnify your economy impact by providing statistical proof.


 * Round 2**
 * Judge:** Arnett
 * Speaker Position:** 1N
 * Comments:**

1NC

10 minutes of speed drills a day keeps the coverage issues away Narrow distinction between tags and card

1NR

you started at the bottom of the debate with conditionality Hard to not extend the CP in this debate given coverage and it gives you another way to win-redo should include this Structure of answering 2AC arguments on off case positions 2AC 1 NU-1. Extend 1NC evidence 2. Indict their evidence 3. read more evidence We need to use words "pol cap" Answering Turns-uniqueness, assessing strength of link versus turn

2ac-
-Don’t read the "no one will challenge us card", we want to say people will challenge but we can beat them if our hard power is high- or they only challenge us if we look weak -Why did you kick the heg IL’s that you did? Seemed random -heg impact work- put on top -japan prolif card in 1ac -need to make no link arg to econ da, aso say heg solves econ decline- solves wars 2ar- --Should be more aggressive that they just are misreading your evidence on the naval readiness IL --CA is just an example- did a good job explaining why bad decisions hurt heg --Be careful- sounded like you started saying strong econ bad- only went to war after econ got better -didn’t use all your speech time -more on why heg solves the economy -more on why econ decline doesn’t hurt heg (spending key)


 * Round 9**
 * Judge:** Arnett
 * Speaker Position:** 1N
 * Comments:**


 * 1NC**

Increase diversity of case arguments e.g. port security. Instead of reading multiple cards on port security funding, make some arguments about how the aff doesn't solve much terrorism. Work in some smart analytic arguments where big holes in the advantages present themselves.


 * 1NR**

Overview then framework. Onto the K proper flow. Framework was on the flow, no? Overview needs to be cleaned up. Should be something prepped prior to the debate. Line by line-Free trade and war seems to be answered on the permutation. Need to construct a link block   Round 11   