JP

Round 1
Judge: Rahim Speaker Position: 2A Comments:

2AC - Theory: States, condo, perfcon, framework - Do comparisons and explanations of your internal links to solving the economy rather than reading more cards - Efficiency on case

2AR - More impact analysis - Needs to break down the debate, its not 2AR-sy enough - Focus on one point of the DA, spend time there, and shatter it

Round 2
Judge: Jesse Speaker Position: 1N Comments:

1NC -Clearer transitions on case--I couldn't tell when you were going to the case turns (which should be on solvency anyway)

1NR -Use the overview for impact calculus/reading new scenarios rather than re-explaining the entire scenario. That can be done implicitly while answering their arguments -Read more cards--politics 1NRs should bury the 2AC in evidence

Round 4
Judge: Arnett Speaker Position: 2A Comments:

Line by Line on the case structure and using 1AC evidence Using all of these internal links effectively Effective grouping

CP -Challenge theoretical legitimacy e.g. conditionality and 50 state fiat Obama -Election-fight impact more specifically on strikes -fight more on link-perception of the plan

Kritik -More impact turns---Need to better leverage the affirmative against their capitalism impacts

2AR

Perm -good small road argument---go after their evidence and use your evidence more specificaly -are you chewing gum:) -I think I'd start with Impact Calc-Hegemony collapse inevitable---all the impacts, and then their impacts and then perm

Round 8
Judge- Andrea Neg vs. Emma and Alex

1nc- need to practice the 1nc so that you know ahead of time that you are no where close to filling your speech time (over :45 seconds left)

1nr- needs to be more balanced in focus and coverage across each page that you take-- the heg bad part of the debate was awesome, but the other arguments also need this level of attention and analysis more cards! spent too much time on the hurricanes mess up trade arg

Round 10
Judge-Arnett Neg vs Chris and Harry

1NC

Clearer Naming of off case positions e.g. Dedevelopment, Elections... Make sure all case arguments are relevant to what their version of the aff is about e.g. more freight and roads args, less airports Remind me that we should work on a T violation against this aff

1NR

Need to win the mitigation more important/trades off with adapation-look in the case neg Need to make some advantage impacts are long term at some point in this debate